Thank you Kate!
Below you will find the answers from my own personal perspective.
In general, I feel that we are able to fulfill our tasks with the resources available. However, in periods the workload was/is very high and our focus was/is spread across many places.
In the beginning, we were both involved in fulfilling all our objectives and hence spent time on the same tasks. We have therefore defined each our primary focus areas, that we are responsible for, along with our shared tasks. The distribution of the workload in GCG is publicly available and can be found here.
However, we are both able to cover each other’s tasks in case of absence - but this way, we are able to spend our time more focused and efficiently so this is definitely an improvement.
For now, we are able to cover this with two people, as we both are committed full-time, but in the short/medium term it would be helpful with a 3rd member. We are hoping that the right candidate, with the same level of commitment, engagement and insight into our Governance process, will present themselves.
I wrote these criteria in our RFC for our mandate for any potential candidates.
If you have anything to add @ImdioR, feel free to jump in!