Hi EtherFuture
Thank you for your detailed answer.
I should disagree with this.
- Centrifuge has the lowest value in ±2 Depth among all competitors.
- The daily trading volume is also is the lowest one.
That is one of the biggest issues for big institutional players to get into CFG and also to get out.
They literally can not buy or sell CFG without moving the price.
None of the big VCs or institutional players want to buy illiquid assets.
I am 100% percent on the same page with you.
Right now, 83% of the tokens are in circulation, which in my opinion should be removed or locked.
We should look at what other RWA protocols (and not only) provide for retail users.
Maple, for example, has locked 38.3% of its circulating supply through simple staking:
Together with the strong governance process, these tokens could not only be locked, but also participate in governance and earn rewards from block rewards.
What are the exchanges you have in mind?
This is partially already happening right now:
I would love to expand this more broadly, of course.
About this i guess @itsbhaji already mentioned something. However, in order to do a significant buy-back and/or burn mechanism, the Protocol Revenue should be substantial.