Does it mean that Centrifuge is not interested to participate in this legal review?
Centrifuge should cover the cost;
Contracting should come from Centrifuge.
Good day!
This topic was discussed during the Governance Call #16 and Governance Call #17 , and the general agreement was that the Issuer should pay for any legal review.
All 1754 investors signed the legal agreement during the onboarding, and the issue with the 1754 pool affects only these investors of one of the specific pools and not all onboarded investors/pools on Tinlake/Centrifuge App.
Please note, that with the approval of all token holders, the Founding Document Centrifuge became the DAO. The spending of any DAO funds should be agreed upon through a collective vote by all token holders.
Any token holder can initiate an RFC and request funds from DAO to cover this legal review in accordance with Centrifuge Governance Framework. If the on-chain voting will be approved via a Democracy Proposal by all token holders, the author of the proposal (/1754 investors) will receive the funds to pay for the legal review.
If you need any help or assistance with this proposal, feel free to contact the Governance and Coordination Group.