Proposition #1 is alright for me since the beginning nothing major to add, maybe once the transactional value will go much higher, we will need to think about a flexible mathematical model on how much fee should be charged and burn, like the DAO would like a burn of 3% per year, so based on the current last 30D transactional fee burn the new fee rate will be X… but we are not there yet…
Proposition #2 I like the staking of CFG idea to show the support toward a new pool, but i don’t like the idea of giving to the stakers CFG as a reward, it would be much preferable to reward them with DAI/USDC or any other stable coin wich would come from a “support” fee wich would be taken from the lenders APY.
Why? Because giving them CFG as a reward will make us go backward in the pressure selling loop that we are currently in, plus I really believe that DEFI protocols should generate cash flow for its holder, in order to, reward them directly (like in this case.) or build a treasury for its Governance/DAO, it would be insane to belive that Centrifuge could ever became 100% community/token holder governed without having a strong treasury!
So yeah #Additional considerations Find a way to create cash flow for the Centrifuge DAO !