Introducing pool types and modifying the POP and protocol fees to better align

Excellent, innovative thinking here!

But to make sure I understood the proposal correctly, each of the three types of pools (Closed Pools, Open Pools, and Centrifuge Prime Portfolios) can potentially hold any of these asset classes?

And the choice of assets will vary based on the pool’s intent and the strategy of the entity/individual creating or managing the pool?

Are there specific technical challenges anticipated when implementing these different pool types?

I might be getting ahead of myself here, but can a single pool mix multiple asset classes, or is it recommended to segregate them?

What led to the specific fee structures proposed for each pool type? Is it based on tradfi fee schedules?

Again, first time, long time.
-Synchrotron

1 Like