# RFC: Updating Tinlake Rewards Allocation 2023-03

**URL:** <https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-updating-tinlake-rewards-allocation-2023-03/5213>\
**Category:** Proposals\
**Tags:** tinlake, 2023, cp4, mar\
**Created:** [March 1, 2023, 9:35pm UTC](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-updating-tinlake-rewards-allocation-2023-03/5213 "2023-03-01T21:35:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 54

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ImdioR](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.centrifuge.io/imdior/32/1011_2.png) [@ImdioR](https://gov.centrifuge.io/u/ImdioR)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2023, 8:46pm UTC](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-updating-tinlake-rewards-allocation-2023-03/5213/54 "2023-03-27T20:46:40Z")

</div>

Good day FortunaFi

This RFC was already moved to off-chain voting on OpenSquare.

You can already vote at your earliest convenience here: [CP40(GI): Updating Tinlake Rewards Allocation 2023-03](https://voting.opensquare.io/p/128)

I think that the most appropriate place for your feedback is here Counter Thinking to CP-40 which would like to propose removing any rewards from Tinlake. So I would like to invite you to repost your message here:

> [@Counter thinking to CP-40 - Tinlake Rewards Proposal to Mint 1.9M CFG](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/counter-thinking-to-cp-40-tinlake-rewards-proposal-to-mint-1-9m-cfg/5285/5):
>
> Yes, it does make a bit hard to follow. However, if Colin’s intention is to create a new proposal to remove the rewards but wants some more discussion around it first, I think it is ok to create this discussion post for more input from the community. This post would have been relevant to make in the RFC while it still was active but CP40 has already moved on to an off-chain vote and submitted to GitHub and cannot be changed anymore so maybe better to start a new discussion from here.

Thank you in advance.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-updating-tinlake-rewards-allocation-2023-03/5213)._
