# GCG Status Q4 2022

**URL:** <https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/gcg-status-q4-2022/4947>\
**Category:** Announcements\
**Tags:** gcg\
**Created:** [December 29, 2022, 2:35pm UTC](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/gcg-status-q4-2022/4947 "2022-12-29T14:35:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rhano](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.centrifuge.io/rhano/32/1014_2.png) [@Rhano](https://gov.centrifuge.io/u/Rhano)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2023, 12:09pm UTC](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/gcg-status-q4-2022/4947/3 "2023-01-04T12:09:01Z")

</div>

Thank you Kate!

Below you will find the answers from my own personal perspective.

> [@Kate\_Bee](#):
>
> Can I ask - in the spirit of a retrospective - what did you lack or long for as you worked? And what could you have improved?

In general, I feel that we are able to fulfill our tasks with the resources available. However, in periods the workload was/is very high and our focus was/is spread across many places.

In the beginning, we were both involved in fulfilling all our objectives and hence spent time on the same tasks. We have therefore defined each our primary focus areas, that we are responsible for, along with our shared tasks. The distribution of the workload in GCG is publicly available and can be found [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c4MQp8GzD5Yzn10QJt3D4zCWnA0PI9SawTe96JOcKgM/edit).

However, we are both able to cover each other’s tasks in case of absence - but this way, we are able to spend our time more focused and efficiently so this is definitely an improvement.

For now, we are able to cover this with two people, as we both are committed full-time, but in the short/medium term it would be helpful with a 3rd member. We are hoping that the right candidate, with the same level of commitment, engagement and insight into our Governance process, will present themselves.

I wrote these criteria in our [RFC for our mandate](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-proposal-for-mandate-for-governance-coordination-group/4609/7) for any potential candidates.

> [@RFC: Proposal for mandate for Governance & Coordination Group](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-proposal-for-mandate-for-governance-coordination-group/4609/7):
>
> **Amount of members:** You are right, to begin with, the group will consist of @ImdioR and myself - but anyone is welcome to apply to join the group. We anticipate that our tasks will require a significant amount of time and dedication so any potential candidate should be prepared and willing to invest a good amount of time to fulfill the tasks. The right candidate should have a good understanding of how our Governance process works (and to some extent also possess technical understanding of the on-chain processes), stay updated with all our Governance activities, and have eyes for details.
> 
> Ideally, we would like to increase the amount of members to three in the short term (within the next couple of months), if the right candidate presents themselves.

If you have anything to add @ImdioR, feel free to jump in!

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/gcg-status-q4-2022/4947)._